
Released in 1963, this was the final Disney film completed before the death of founder Walt Disney.
Although The Sword in the Stone is far from the studio’s best effort, it holds a special place in our hearts as we watched it so many times as stupid kids.
The Sword in the Stone
Set in England (yes, that one) we find Kind Uther Pendragon has died – the nation is in chaos as there’s no heir to the throne.
Suddenly, a sword set in stone appears in London (yes, that one).
The inscription on the thing states that whomever can yank the blade from the stone will be England’s next tally, bally ho king.
A big batch of egos turn out – mainly knights and whatnot – convinced they’re set to be the next king. But the sword won’t budge. There is no king!
Several years on and a scrawny young orphan called Arthur (nicknamed Wart by his bullying foster brother Kay) stumbles across a mysterious wizard called Merlin.
He also has a pet owl called Archimedes, who can talk (and laugh).
The duo take on Arthur to tutor him – as part of this education.
But not before a hungry wolf (who we always really liked) has a good at turning young Arthur into lunch.
After this, Merlin begins transforming the young lad and himself into various animals to find out about physics.
This includes a bird, fish, and squirrel. All three expeditions are pretty disastrous, involving life-or-death struggles to overcome the the odds. Mad Madam Mim is a highlight.
In typical Disney fashion, there’s a pretty heartbreaking bit where a female squirrel falls head over tail in love with the Arthur-squirrel hybrid.
Of course, the latter can’t repay that in any way and the female is left to, forlorny, stare into the distance never able to get at Arthur again.
Many of you will know the story, anyway, but it turns out young Arthur/Wart can then easily yank the sword from the stone. To the consternation of many (except Merlin and Archimedes).
Right, so it’s a good fun film with plenty going for it. For 1963, there are some highly impressive visual flourishes from Disney. Really pushing boundaries, in many respects.
This was the 18th Disney film and features the usual elements of slapstick and silly humour, life lessons, dark moments, and catchy songs by the Sherman Brothers.
Those darker elements aren’t on the level of Bambi, but as kids they sure made us think about the unpleasant people in the world out there.
A good fun film, then, and one that marks a poignant coda in Disney’s long and illustrious history.
Production
Directed by American animator Wolfgang Reitherman (1909-1985), the budget of $3 million brought in a solid $22 million box office hit. An impressive return back in 1963.
The animated film is adapted from the eponymous novel by T. H. White. The autor died in January 1964, aged 57, and was barely able to see the film. It had launched on Christmas day in December 1963.
As we know, Disney is currently going through its back catalogue and producing live-action versions of its various works.
It’s currently in development, but there are no official trailers as of yet. Or cast details. We do know Juan Carlos Fresnadillo is directing, who is famous for 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later.
They’re incredibly violent and terrifying zombie films. So, yeah… a lighthearted kids film seems like the next natural step.
But at least The Sword in the Stone will get a new lease of life. As we have a soft spot for it to this day.
Ahahah! Fresnadillo is directing this one? Well, Guy Ritchie directed Aladdin, so I guess he can do it… but it sounds like a weird choice!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, a bit weird. I found out today the guy who wrote the Chernobyl series was previously famous for The Hangover II and III (the latter being dreadful). So… hidden talents.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly! Also, a man’s got to eat… so even directors who love certain genres must accept jobs far from their interests in order to survive!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Truth! Damn, we’ll have a flame war one of these days. We just need the right setting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
X—D
LikeLiked by 1 person
This, along with Robin Hood, was one of our go to Disney films as kids. I can’t tell you how many times I watched this, and it actually got me to read T. H. White’s book of the same title. I went through a major attempt to read all of the books/stories Disney movies were based on, whatever I could find in my library. Bambi by Felix Salter is even darker and The Fox and the Hound by Daniel P. Mannix is NOTHING like the film. It pretty much only shares character names. The plot is completely different. But Sword in the Stone hits all of my nostalgia feels.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Same here! Loved the fox in Robin Hood. Me and my sister watched them over and over and over. The live action remakes… well, Sword and the Stone is up this year I believe. Hmmmmm….
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suppose we shall see. Have you seen The Lion King remake? We did. I liked it, but I understand the criticisms with it, and the original will always be my favorite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m hoping to catch it soon as critics can go a bit OTT at times, as with the incendiary reactions by vloggers for comedic effect and clicks. I should imagine it’s perfectly enjoyable, just not up to the standard of the original. Disney just knew it would make a tonne of money.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s perfectly enjoyable even though I’m sure my nostalgia circuits were a big part of that. I agreed with some of the critical issues, but not enough to hate the movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person